![]() ![]() That doesn’t mean there haven’t been more, just that I’ve only actually ran into them twice. You mentioned breaking changes?Īs I alluded to in my introduction I’ve only personally ran into breaking changes on the. Grab some popcorn, read the article, and then read the comments. Rather than talk about their points–either in favor or opposition–I’m simply presenting them with the link and I’ll let you decide on your own how you feel about it. ![]() To provide an ASP.NET Core integration package for Json.NET.To remove the Json.NET dependency from ASP.NET Core.It is easy to know which packages belong simply due to version parity with all the stuff 3.x+.Īccording to this blog post by Immo Landwerth, Microsoft’s primary reasons to build a new JSON library are: That, of course, isn’t the only reason but it’s still a pretty good one. NET 5 and unification of the platform, they are standardizing on versioning. This means that it has it’s own developers, it’s own release cycle, and, more importantly, it’s own versioning scheme. While Newtonsoft Json.NET is great, Microsoft doesn’t control it. Microsoft has been packaging Newtonsoft Json.NET alongside. That said, you will still want to be aware of the limitations and changes in. NET Core 3.x you may not run into breaking changes. ![]() If you are starting an application fresh with. NET Core 3.x, however, Microsoft switched to their implementation in. NET Core 3.x, Newtonsoft is the default JSON engine. NET Core and how it handles JSON serialization (and deserialization). NET Core 3.x, you’ll want to be aware of some changes in the defaults. Once with WCF configuration in my app.config, and recently with the JSON serialization (or deserialization, as it were). In that time I have only experienced a breaking change twice. NET 1.0 right after it’s initial release. I started my programming journey learning C# on. ![]()
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |